Kiến trúc khu vực Ấn Độ Dương - Thái Bình Dương đang định hình trong bối cảnh cạnh tranh chiến lược Mỹ - Trung
Tóm tắt
As a geostrategic space promoted by the US and its allies, the Indo-Pacific regional architecture is being shaped up with multi-directional, multi-layered, and increasingly fragmented trends. While the US is strengthening its hub-and-spoke alliance structure into a network system through lattice-work mechanisms, China advocates multilateralism while seeking to draw the Global South into new initiatives linked to its Belt and Road grand strategy. In an increasingly polarized world, ASEAN’s centrality faces numerous challenges. Nevertheless, efforts to strengthen linkages among middle powers and the restructuring of the global system also offer certain economic and political opportunities for ASEAN’s members to participate in shaping a new regional order.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ganchev, I. (2024), “China and the BRI ten years on: Geopolitics and Development”, Regional Policy Insights, 2 (1): 1-48.
Goh, E. (2005), Meeting the China challenge: The U.S. in Southeast Asian Regional Security Strategies (M. Alagappa, Ed.), East-West Center.
Heiduk, F. & Wacker, G. (2020), “From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific: Significance, implementation and challenges”, SWP Research Paper, 9/2020, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin.
Henrikson, A.K. (1996), Negotiating World Order: The architecture and artisanship of global diplomacy. New York: Rowmann and Littlefield Publishers.
Jha, S. (2023), “India and order transition in the Indo-Pacific: Resisting the Quad as a ‘security community’“, Contemporary Security Policy, 44 (1), 1-27.
Kewalramani, M. (2023), China’s vision for a new world order: GDI, GSI & GCI”, Takshashila Institutuion.
Khurana, G.S. (2007), “Security of sea lines: Prospects for India-Japan cooperation”, Srategic Analysis, 31:1, 139 - 153.
Kritiuk, B., Van den Bosch, J.J.J. Jaskólska, A. & Sato, Y. (eds.) (2023), Handbook of Indo-Pacific studies, Routledge, New York and London.
Kuik, C.-C. (2022), “Hedging via institutions: ASEAN-led multilateralism in the age of the Indo-Pacific”, Asian Journal of Peacebuilding, 10 (2): 355-386.
Mahapatra, C. (ed.) (2025), Indo-Pacific strategic churn challenges & state responses, Palgrave Series in Indo-Pacific Studies, Springer.
Medcalf, R. (2018), “Reimagining Asia: From Asia-Pacific to Indo-Pacific”, In G. R. A. J. C. L. (Ed.), International Relations and Asia’s Southern Tier: ASEAN, Australia and India, pp. 9-28, Springer.
Hoàng Khắc Nam (2020), Cấu trúc khu vực châu Á - Thái Bình Dương: Lý luận và thực tiễn, Nxb. Chính trị quốc gia Sự thật, Hà Nội.
Organski, A.F.K. (1958), World politics, Alfred A. Knoff, New York.
Parry, M. (2022) Australia’s strategic view of the Indo-Pacific, European Parliamentary Research Service.
Shoji, T. (2021), “Belt and Road” vs. “Free and Open Indo-Pacific”: Competition over regional order and ASEAN’s responses, Security & Strategy, 1: 3-24.
Waltz, K.N. (1979), Theory of international politics, Addison-Wesley Publishing.
Yeo, A. (2019), Asia’s regional architecture: Alliances and institutions in the pacific century, Stanford University Press.
Yoshimatsu, H. (2024), “India and Japan in the Indo-Pacific: Secondary powers’ strategies amid the Intensifying US-China rivalry”, The Journal of Indian and Asian Studies, 5 (2): 2440005 (2024).
